East View
Press Blog

» Free Articles
» Table of Contents Alerts
» Insight From Our Editors
» New Title Updates
» And More...

Follow @EastViewPress @EastViewPress
Follow /EastPress /EastPress
East View Companies

East View Press Blog
Go Back
  • Current Digest of the Russian Press: Letter From the Editors #49

    Letter From the Editors: Nov. 30-Dec. 6, 2015

    PDF Downloads:
    Issue #49 Letter From the Editors
    Issue #49 Table of Contents

    Putin’s Message to the Federal Assembly: Rhetoric vs. Reality.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin used all the “right” words in his annual Message to the Federal Assembly when talking about Russia’s foreign and domestic policies. But how well does his rhetoric measure up to reality?

    Putin struck a largely conciliatory tone when discussing international relations, but he nevertheless lashed out at Turkey for shooting down a Russian bomber flying a combat mission in Syria. The president’s harsh words for Turkey come after the announcement of a series of punitive measures that include sanctions on Turkish goods and workers entering Russia and on Russian tourists traveling to Turkey (ostensibly to ensure “the national security and protection of Russian citizens from criminal actions”), as well as a decision to halt cooperation with Turkey on the Turkish Stream natural gas pipeline project. Even though Putin contends that, with respect to Turkey, Russia’s “actions will be governed, first and foremost, by our responsibility to our nation and our people,” Sergei Aleksashenko says that Russia’s sanctions will actually hurt Russia more than Turkey.

    Despite what Putin said in his address about enhancing Russia’s cooperation with international partners, Russian lawmakers seem eager to free Russia from the requirements of international laws, the very foundation of global relations. Recently passed legislation would give Russia’s Constitutional Court the power to decide if Russia must abide by the rulings of international courts. Also contrary to Putin’s rhetoric regarding greater engagement with other countries was his curt, off-topic speech at an international climate conference in Paris that, according to Tatyana Stanovaya, demonstrated just how much Russia has lost its edge in diplomatic maneuvering amid the recent geopolitical storms involving Russia and the West.

    Yekaterina Kuznetsova says that Russia lacks true allies, and she attributes this to Moscow’s persistent resentment of its perceived mistreatment by other nations. “Our actions on the global arena are reminiscent of the actions of an old man who shuns young people who have a worldview to which he is unaccustomed and do not recognize his unquestionable supremacy,” she writes. She says Russia is unable to function as part of an international coalition because it always sees itself as the “center of the world, not a rank-and-file member of a coalition.” In her opinion, instead of real allies, Russia has a series of imaginary ones that she says will cost it more dearly to retain on the future.

    Although some experts were surprised by Putin’s unusually frank assessment of the dire condition of Russia’s economy, his rhetoric regarding business, and entrepreneurship in his Message also fell short of reality. In his Message, Putin said that greater trust must be built between the government and businesses, that more freedom should be granted to entrepreneurs, and that the government should listen to the people, and treat civil society and the business community as equal partners. However, some in Russia are instead seeing the growth of government at the expense of private businesses, entrepreneurs and civil society. Yekaterina Shulman comments that “the solution to every problem seems to be to create yet another government agency, with new officials and new powers.” The creeping bureaucratic overreach has not gone unnoticed by Russia’s long-haul truckers, who went on strike after a levy was imposed on them for every kilometer they travel.

    Putin’s latest Message to the Federal Assembly seemingly underscores the disconnect between rhetoric and reality that is par for the course in any political system anywhere in the world. But does that have to keep us from wondering whether Putin might ever become an exception to the rule, and that his enormous popular support and extensive executive powers might someday enable him to match noble words with noble actions?

    Matthew Larson,

    Translator/Copy Editor

    Full story

    Comments (0)

  • Current Digest of the Russian Press: Letter From the Editors #50

    Letter From the Editors: Dec. 7-13, 2015

    PDF Downloads:
    Issue #50 Letter From the Editors
    Issue #50 Table of Contents

    When Putin Looks in the Mirror, He Sees Erdogan; Can Russian Truckers Bring Down the Regime?

    Friendships in big politics are about as fickle as they are in high school. Case in point – former best friends Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Trade between the two countries was booming, and Russian tourists flocked to Turkish resorts every year. What’s more, according to Konstantin von Eggert, Putin and Erdogan also have very similar personalities. But then Nov. 24 happened, when the Turkish side downed a Russian jet for allegedly violating its airspace. And paradoxically, Putin’s and Erdogan’s similar personalities have become the biggest stumbling block in resolving the matter.

    How are the two presidents similar? Both are paternalistic and rely on the average voter as their main support base; both “dislike intellectuals, journalists and the urban middle class”; and both have undertaken ambitious military reforms. In fact, if the confrontation between Putin and Erdogan moves into the military arena, it may effectively end Moscow’s operations in Syria: Turkey controls access to the Bosporus Strait, which is used to bring supplies to the Russian grouping in Syria. In fact, Turkey may already have an excuse for such a drastic move, now that Russia’s “political clown” Vladimir Zhirinovsky has called for a nuclear attack on Turkey.

    According to Zhirinovsky, “For the past 90 years, since the time of Lenin, Russia has supported Turkey. This has been a historical mistake.” However, Moscow and Ankara may limit themselves to tough rhetoric and produce bans, since an actual all-out war between the two countries is not what the average voter wants. And just like Putin, Erdogan considers himself a man of the people.

    Of course, when it comes to the “average Joe” back home, Putin may have a serious problem on his hands: Truckers protesting new highway fees have become a major thorn in the authorities’ side. This is bad news for Putin, writes Novaya gazeta, since the Russian president’s authority is propped up by two whales – the “spoon-fed oligarchy” and the everyman voters. Now, the former is coming into conflict with the latter, since the tariffs were rolled out by long-time Putin crony Arkady Rotenberg (and are now colloquially referred to as the “Rotenberg tax”). So could it be that the regime’s undoing will be the work of the “common man” – rather than a “fifth column” of pro-Western intellectuals, as Kremlin propaganda would have us believe?

    According to political émigré Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the Kremlin could indeed have a revolution on its hands. Khodorkovsky believes that the recent wave of political controversies is living proof that the people’s patience is wearing thin. The latest scandal involves the Russian Prosecutor General’s links to the ruthless Tsapok gang – forever etched in the public’s mind after the brutal murders in the village of Kushchevskaya. The investigation, carried out by Aleksei Navalny’s Anticorruption Fund, took the public by storm and went viral on YouTube, writes Nezavisimaya gazeta. And the authorities, who usually pretend Navalny doesn’t exist, were forced to comment on the allegations. Of course, PG Yury Chaika still has his job and has blamed the entire scandal on Hermitage Capital head Bill Browder. So don’t expect things to change overnight, says The Moscow Times.

    Finally, another political standoff is heating up in Ukraine: Firebrand Odessa Province Governor Mikhail Saakashvili continued his assault on the Arseny Yatsenyuk government for aiding and abetting corruption. Many experts believe that Saakashvili’s anticorruption grandstanding was timed to coincide with US Vice-President Joe Biden’s visit to Ukraine, because Saakashvili hopes to be appointed Poroshenko’s right-hand man. Given that Saakashvili is currently more popular than the president himself, that tactic may very well pay off.

    Xenia Grushetsky,

    Managing Editor

    Full story

    Comments (0)

  • Current Digest of the Russian Press: Letter From the Editors #16

    Letter From the Editors: April 18-24, 2016

    PDF Downloads:
    Issue #16 Letter From the Editors
    Issue #16 Table of Contents

    Navalny Takes on the CEC; Russia Ups the Ante With Antics Over the Baltic; and a Possible Homecoming for Savchenko

    Shel Silverstein’s poem “Hug O’ War” starts with the lines: “I will not play at tug o’ war/ I’d rather play at hug o’ war/ Where everyone hugs/ Instead of tugs/ Where everyone giggles/ And rolls on the rug.” You won’t find anyone rolling on the rug in Brussels this week, however. Despite the fact that the NATO-Russia Council has resumed its work following a two-year hiatus, the meeting ended up being the usual exchange of tired grievances.

    So why was this format resurrected, and why now? According to military expert Viktor Litovkin, it was mainly because of “the Russian military’s successes in conducting the antiterrorist operation in Syria.” Apparently, Washington was so bowled over by Russia’s show of strength that it finally saw the light and decided to treat it with a little more respect. Litovkin does not give NATO countries any credit, though – according to him, “the alliance is Washington’s fine-tuned military-political tool used to enslave and control Europe.” So he suggests starting a dialogue, but strictly with Washington. “As for Stoltenberg & Co., they should go have a smoke.”

    Another tug o’ war – this time in Russia – resulted in a slightly more amicable outcome. After candidates from Aleksei Navalny’s Anticorruption Foundation announced they were dropping out of local village council elections due to procedural irregularities, the CEC made a surprise move – it invalidated the election results. The brouhaha started after it was discovered that several hundred people had voted early. In a small village, that translated to a fairly large percentage of the votes. In addition, the opposition candidates noted other instances of fraud: “free rides for voters to polling stations” and “bribes in the form of property rights offers.”

    Newly appointed CEC chairwoman Ella Pamfilova sat down with Navalny’s delegates, but nothing came of the meeting. Or so it seemed. The next day, the CEC nullified the election results. Pamfilova claims the move had nothing to do with Navalny. According to the Golos election watchdog, she made the decision so that the controversy “is not used to discredit the CEC’s subsequent work and elections in general.” Still, a point for Navalny?

    Another tug o’ war – this one in the sky over the Baltic Sea – could have had much more serious repercussions. The US was incensed that two Russian Su‑24 jets buzzed the USS Donald Cook, flying just a few meters from the deck. The next day saw a similar provocation, when a Russian Su‑27 fighter intercepted a US Air Force RC‑135U reconnaissance aircraft. According to military expert Pavel Felgengauer, one wrong move could have ignited a very real war. Is the Russian military double-dog daring its US counterparts in a risky game with global repercussions? And how will the US respond?

    Ukraine may be winning its own tug o’ war with Russia when it comes to celebrity pilot Nadezhda Savchenko, who was recently sentenced to 22 years in prison for the murder and attempted murder of a Russian journalist team. Since then, a lot of paperwork has been shuttling back and forth between the Russian Justice Ministry and its Ukrainian counterpart. Most experts and journalists believe that Savchenko will be exchanged for Russian servicemen Aleksandr Aleksandrov and Yevgeny Yerofeyev. This would explain why she did not file an appeal, writes RBC Daily.

    One person who says he is fed up with a tug o’ war is Aleksandr Lukashenko. In his typically flamboyant style, the Belarussian president said he refuses to be “Russia’s lackey,” and that it’s about time Moscow showed him some respect – perhaps in the form of an oil field, which Lukashenko proposed to barter for a tractor plant. “Let’s be friends,” Lukashenko concluded. Looks like someone is ready to roll on the rug.

    Xenia Grushetsky,

    Managing Editor

    Full story

    Comments (0)