THE NATO declaration formulated at its 75th anniversary session has effectively shut the door on any discussion about coming to terms with the collective West. NATO and the West, embodied by the “elite horizontal” of the deep state, have chosen the path of war.1 The option of a Cold War 2.0 has, for several years now, been considered by analysts in the US and the UK as an absolute priority and the most beneficial path for them.
INTERVIEWS “The Americans Act Like a Street Gang That Picks on Passersby Just Because They Don’t Like the Color of Their Shoes”S. Ryabkov “If Ukraine Ever Conies Back to Its Senses, It Will Realize That It Simply Cannot Survive Without Russia and Good Neighborly Relations With Russia”K. Kosachev The Political Map of BRICSYu. Shafranik WORLD […]
MARIA Zakharova, Director of the Information and Press Department of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in her article “The Global West and Global South: Development Paths,” outlined several positions that are fundamentally important for the theory and practice of international relations.
FOCUS ON RUSSIA Modern Russia in the Collective Consciousness of Its ResidentsL. Belyaeva The Contradictory Role of the State and the Agency of the Elderly in Prolonging the Employment of Older Generations: Reconstructing Expert PerceptionsO. Parfenova, I. Petukhova Beyond the Ecumene: Where the Periphery EndsL. Bliakher, K. Grigorichev ESSAYS Federalism Is Full of Good IntentionsV. […]
In this article, I examine N. A. Berdyayev’s social philosophy of technology, which he positions as Christian-personalistic-socialistic. I reconstruct its main provisions and identify its “metaphysical” and “sociological” aspects. I show, first, that according to Berdyayev, metaphysics of technology is the critique of the modern idea of man about himself as homo faber or a toolmaking animal, which is the result of his violation of the eternal order of values and the creation of an idol from technology
VIEWPOINT From a Course on Political Demonology, or Fascism in a NutshellI. Kravchenko WORLD ISSUES The Great Game, or the Struggle for a New WorldP. Frolov Nuclear Doctrine Is a “Living Document”A. Oganesyan Functions of Nuclear Deterrence (FREE content)S. Karaganov UN Security Council Resolution 1540 on Non-Proliferation: 20 Years LaterG. Mashkov How to Jump-Start UN […]
BY PUBLISHING the article “The Use of Nuclear Weapons Could Protect Humanity from a Global Catastrophe”1 just under a year ago, I, along with some colleagues, helped initiate a global discussion2 on the role of nuclear weapons in preventing global war. Gradually, the concept of “strategic parasitism” – the belief held by most elites and societies, especially in the West, that peace is eternal and does not require effort to maintain, and that nonnuclear wars can be waged with impunity – began to recede into the past.
We would like to share with you a practical analysis by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs ‘ International Law Advisory Board of the activities of the so-called International Criminal Court (ICC).
FOCUS ON RUSSIA The Attitude of Russian Citizens Toward the Main Contradictions in Their SocietyI. Dudin “Green Guardians”: Attitudes of Russian Conservatives to Environmental ProblemsA. Scherbak, N. Zubarev, E. Semushkina Collective Behavior Models in Russia: Past and FutureYa. Mirkin ESSAYS The Fate of “Grand Theories” in EconomicsV. Avtonomov Health in Old Age: Stereotypes and Objective […]
This article analyzes the contemporary Russian historiography on the sources of Ukrainian nationalism. Consideration of its genesis takes into account three periods: the era of feudalism, the 19th century, and the 20th century.